{"id":5345,"date":"2026-06-06T11:37:37","date_gmt":"2026-06-06T11:37:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/?p=5345"},"modified":"2026-06-06T11:37:42","modified_gmt":"2026-06-06T11:37:42","slug":"decisions-parameters-jakubiec-matrix","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/en\/decisions-parameters-jakubiec-matrix\/","title":{"rendered":"Cognitive Traps and Their Impact on Decision\u2011Making in the Fogg Model"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

In several previous texts, I presented some cognitive biases (thinking traps), including the fundamental attribution error<\/a><\/em>, tunnel vision<\/a><\/em>, and my original concept of the Coupled Confirmation Bias<\/a><\/em>. I wrote about them mainly in the context of their impact on the dynamics of conflict, which I observe in my daily work. Now I want to take a step further and show how these same mechanisms influence the decision\u2011making process in the Fogg model.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To move forward, I introduce a set of tools I\u2019ve developed myself \u2014 three decision’s parameters and eight resulting decision types. In the next section, I walk through how these elements interact and why they matter. This framework is entirely my own creation; I find it promising and intuitively useful, though it still needs to be tested in practice. For now, it remains a proposal \u2014 and I state that openly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What Are Cognitive Biases?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Cognitive biases are, in other words, errors or traps in thinking. The term was popularized by Daniel Kahneman. This outstanding psychologist published the book Thinking, Fast and Slow<\/a><\/em>, in which he described mechanisms that affect all of us. Not because something is wrong with us. These mechanisms serve important functions. They simplify many matters. They allow us, for example, to conserve energy or solve a given problem well enough to move on to the next one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But in complex social relationships, they cause us to misjudge reality, create false narratives in our minds, and ultimately make poor decisions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Which Cognitive Biases Do We Know?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

There are many cognitive biases, and we have probably not discovered all of them yet. Here I will briefly present only a few:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. Confirmation bias<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Fundamental Attribution Error<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Status quo bias<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. Sunk costs fallacy<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  5. Coupled Confirmation Bias<\/a><\/em><\/strong> \u2013 my original concept (and its extension), which is only a hypothesis and requires further development and empirical validation.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  6. Tunnel vision<\/a><\/em><\/strong>, which is not a cognitive bias in itself, but a systemic mechanism.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    The impact of cognitive biases on decision\u2011making \u2014 for example, in the context of reaching agreements \u2014 is the subject of extensive scientific research. Some of them are considered inhibiting, others reinforcing. This distinction is useful for drawing further conclusions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Below I will present, in order:<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
      \n
    • the mode of decision\u2011making in the Fogg model, and<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • the parameters of a decision once it is made.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

      Only then will I show how selected cognitive biases can influence both whether we make a decision at all, and the content of that decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      The Fogg Decision\u2011Making Model<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

      The Fogg model describes human behavior as the result of three interacting components: motivation<\/strong>, ability<\/strong>, and a trigger<\/strong>. A behavior \u2014 including a decision \u2014 occurs only when all three appear at the same moment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      This means that even if a person wants<\/em> to make a decision (motivation). And even if they can<\/em> make it (ability), the decision will not happen without a trigger. Conversely, even a strong trigger will not work if motivation is too low or the action feels too difficult.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      In practice, this model explains why people in conflict often remain stuck in indecision, delay key steps, or choose actions that are irrational from the outside. Their internal configuration of motivation, ability, and triggers is disrupted \u2014 and cognitive biases play a decisive role in that disruption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \"Diagram<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

      Let us remember that, for a decision to occur, all three elements \u2014<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        \n
      1. motivation<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      2. ability<\/strong>, and<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      3. trigger<\/strong> \u2014 must appear together<\/strong>. I have already discussed this in detail in a previous text.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

        Now I will pose a question:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        What Is \u201cAbility\u201d in Fogg\u2019s Framework?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

        I understand ability<\/em> as a property whose characteristics are better captured by the word feasibility<\/em>. I did not elaborate on this aspect in the previous article, so I will do it now.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        In the Fogg model, feasibility<\/em> \u2014 in my interpretation \u2014 is the resultant of two subjectively perceived factors:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \n
        1. one\u2019s own capabilities, and<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        2. the difficulty of the task.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

          Only the decision\u2011maker\u2019s perception matters. Of course, they may misjudge the situation due to a cognitive error or faulty data. Interestingly, such an error may ultimately lead to a beneficial decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Imagine that I have incomplete or inaccurate data. Acting under the influence of a logical or cognitive error, I draw incorrect conclusions from them. Those conclusions would be considered correct if I had access to complete or accurate data \u2014 and if I were not acting under the influence of error.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          This can be summarized in one sentence:\u00a0Fogg\u2019s triad influences the act of decision\u2011making, which is not identical with the way the decision is executed.<\/strong>\u00a0The manner of executing a previously made decision is described by\u00a0decision parameters<\/strong>\u00a0(discussed below).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          What Are the 8 Types of Decisions?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

          I propose that decisions analyzed through the lens of their execution should be assigned three parameters<\/strong>. These parameters determine how the decision is carried out. The three decision parameters I propose below allow me to distinguish eight types of decisions<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

          In the following section, I present how each configuration combines to form these eight decision types. This is my original concept, which I find highly useful, though it naturally requires further testing.<\/strong> For now, it remains solely my own proposal, which I state explicitly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          My proposal of 3 Decision’s Parameters<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

          The three decision’s parameters<\/strong> are: vector<\/strong>, dynamics<\/strong>, and determination<\/strong> (I am considering whether momentum<\/em> might be a better term).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          1. Vector<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

          Its reference point is the current state. Its value is 0<\/strong> or 1<\/strong>. Let 0<\/strong> denote a tendency to remain in the existing arrangement, and 1<\/strong> a drive toward change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          2. Dynamics<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

          Let us distinguish two values of dynamics: (+)<\/strong> and (\u2013)<\/strong>, where (+)<\/strong> means that the decision results in action, and (\u2013)<\/strong> means passivity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          3. Determination<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

          Let us define two levels: (L)<\/strong> and (H)<\/strong>, where (L)<\/strong> stands for low determination<\/em>, and (H)<\/strong> stands for high determination<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Vector<\/strong> expresses the attitude toward the current state and its change. A decision to defend the status quo or to alter it may be realized \u2014 depending on circumstances \u2014 through passivity or action<\/strong> (dynamics + or \u2013). Determination<\/strong> is a function of readiness to engage, which I understand as the resultant of:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            \n
          1. willingness to bear costs (financial, reputational, organizational, energetic, or even biological), and<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          2. tolerance of risk.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

            Vector, dynamics, and determination form a simplified heuristic model<\/strong> created by me (at least I am not aware of any publications that use these parameters \u2014 apart from the previously mentioned inhibiting and reinforcing biases). Its usefulness certainly requires further research \u2014 for now, it remains a hypothetical model<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            I also emphasize that the human psyche is not mathematics \u2014 yet paradoxically, mathematics allows us to understand the psyche better.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Table 1: The Three Decision’s Parameters<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
            Decision Parameter<\/strong><\/th>Parameter Value<\/strong><\/th>Description and Meaning of the Parameter<\/strong><\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
            Vector<\/strong><\/th>0<\/strong><\/td>Indicates a tendency to maintain the current state. The decision\u2011maker interprets the situation as one in which it is better to remain with the status quo.<\/td><\/tr>
            <\/th>1<\/strong><\/td>Indicates a drive to change the current state. The decision\u2011maker concludes that the existing arrangement requires modification or abandonment.<\/td><\/tr>
            Dynamics<\/strong><\/th>+<\/strong><\/td>A decision executed through action. It means actively doing something intended to maintain or change the state.<\/td><\/tr>
            <\/th>\u2013<\/strong><\/td>A decision executed through passivity. It means refraining from action as a way of achieving the goal (maintaining or changing the state).<\/td><\/tr>
            Determination<\/strong><\/th>L<\/strong><\/td>Low determination. Indicates limited willingness to bear costs and low risk tolerance. The decision is weak and easily altered.<\/td><\/tr>
            <\/th>H<\/strong><\/td>High determination. Indicates a strong willingness to bear costs (financial, emotional, organizational, biological) and high risk tolerance. The decision is strong and stable.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

            Using the three parameters listed above allows us to distinguish eight types of decisions<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Table 2: Eight Types of Decisions<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
            Decision Type No.<\/strong><\/th>Vector<\/strong><\/th>Dynamics<\/strong><\/th>Determination<\/strong><\/th>Description of the Decision<\/strong><\/th>Example<\/strong><\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
            1<\/strong><\/th>0<\/strong><\/td>\u2013<\/strong><\/td>L<\/strong><\/td>A decision to maintain the status quo through passivity with low determination<\/td>I decide to sleep a bit longer<\/td><\/tr>
            2<\/strong><\/th>0<\/strong><\/td>\u2013<\/strong><\/td>H<\/strong><\/td>A decision to maintain the status quo through non\u2011action with high determination<\/td>Sitting on a tree, I decide not to move so I don\u2019t fall<\/td><\/tr>
            3<\/strong><\/th>0<\/strong><\/td>+<\/strong><\/td>L<\/strong><\/td>A decision to maintain the status quo through action with low determination<\/td>I decide to shoo away the cat that is waking me up<\/td><\/tr>
            4<\/strong><\/th>0<\/strong><\/td>+<\/strong><\/td>H<\/strong><\/td>A decision to maintain the status quo through action with high determination<\/td>I defend my daughter from an attacker<\/td><\/tr>
            5<\/strong><\/th>1<\/strong><\/td>\u2013<\/strong><\/td>L<\/strong><\/td>A decision to bring about change through passivity with low determination<\/td>I don\u2019t water flowers I dislike so they will wither<\/td><\/tr>
            6<\/strong><\/th>1<\/strong><\/td>\u2013<\/strong><\/td>H<\/strong><\/td>A decision to bring about change through passivity with high determination<\/td>I decide not to save someone when I want them to drown<\/td><\/tr>
            7<\/strong><\/th>1<\/strong><\/td>+<\/strong><\/td>L<\/strong><\/td>A decision to bring about change through action with low determination<\/td>I want to trim the cat\u2019s claws<\/td><\/tr>
            8<\/strong><\/th>1<\/strong><\/td>+<\/strong><\/td>H<\/strong><\/td>A decision to bring about change through action with high determination<\/td>I want to escape from prison<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

            Jakubiec<\/strong> eight types of decisions<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Let us add that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              \n
            • decisions with vector 0<\/strong> (maintaining the status quo), and<\/li>\n\n\n\n
            • decisions with negative dynamics (\u2013)<\/strong>, i.e., achieving the goal through passivity,<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

              do not<\/strong> in any way mean the absence of a decision. These are not the same. I may decide to sit quietly and remain motionless so that someone does not find me. That decision is not the same as externally observed passivity caused, for example, by apathy or an ambivalent attitude toward the situation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              Similarly, it must be noted that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                \n
              • a decision aimed at change (Vector 1<\/strong>) cannot be equated with action (+)<\/strong>, and<\/li>\n\n\n\n
              • a decision aimed at defending the status quo (Vector 0<\/strong>) cannot be equated with the absence of action.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                The initial state (status quo) may be so desirable that we decide to defend it actively (vector 0, dynamics +). Thus, not wanting change, we will take action. Example: If I want a drowning person to survive, I will rescue them. Not wanting to allow a change (life \u2192 death), I will take action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Conversely, it may happen that in striving for change we decide not to act. If I want a drowning person to die, it is enough that I do not rescue them. Drowning represents a change in their state (life \u2192 death) brought about by my passivity. Here we have vector 1, negative dynamics, and a level of determination which, in this example, we do not know \u2014 but we assume it would have to be very high.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                For completeness, it must also be stated that the absence of a decision to change is not identical with a decision to maintain the status quo<\/strong>. A lack of decision results from the absence of at least one element of the decision triad (see above). Thus, the absence of a decision may result from a lack of motivation, a subjectively perceived lack of feasibility, or the absence of a trigger. This does not necessarily mean that the stimulus is irrelevant to us. It may, for example, generate motivation, but we will not make a decision because the task appears unfeasible. In such a situation, the objective absence of action cannot be equated with passivity as a chosen parameter of a made decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Example<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                When encountering a bear in the mountains, I may decide either to surrender or to save my life. But whether I achieve this by playing dead, fighting, or running \u2014 that is a parameter of the decision<\/strong>. And in this respect, it may be chosen correctly or incorrectly: I may run up a tree the bear can climb after me, or hide in a rock crevice where it cannot reach me. This does not change the fact that I decided to stay alive (vector 0) through action in the form of escape (dynamics +) or through passivity in the form of playing dead (dynamics \u2013), with high determination in each case (H).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                As I indicated above, one must distinguish between lying down because I consciously chose to survive by playing dead, and lying down because I concluded that I have no chance anyway, and besides, I have not wanted to live for a long time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                What Is the Relationship Between Cognitive Biases, the Decision Triad, and Decision Parameters?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                Above, I outlined three areas: cognitive biases, the decision triad, and the decision parameters. A natural question arises: how can these elements relate to one another?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Let us begin with the clarification that there is no determinism<\/strong> here. Cognitive biases do not determine<\/em> a given decision, but they significantly increase the tendency \u2014 they \u201cpull\u201d in a particular direction. I also note that one may simultaneously remain under the influence of two or more biases, originating from different sources, whose effects intersect at a given moment, each \u201cpushing\u201d the decision\u2011maker in a different (or the same) direction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                The Influence of Cognitive Biases on the Decision Triad (the Act of Making a Decision)<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                As indicated above, cognitive biases may act at every stage and level of decision\u2011making and decision execution. It may turn out that when the decision triad is activated, one bias becomes influential, and when setting the parameters of execution, we operate under the influence of another. It may also happen that two biases act simultaneously, and their mutual relationship is positive (they act in the same direction), partially opposing, or entirely opposing. Most often, however, we will remain under the influence of one of them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Let us assume that cognitive biases may influence:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                  \n
                • the emergence of motivation by affecting the evaluation of the stimulus that generates emotion, and consequently the direction or strength of motivation;<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                • the subjective assessment of feasibility;<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                • susceptibility to a trigger.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                  Let us also assume that, with respect to each element of the decision triad, the influence of a cognitive bias may be reinforcing<\/strong> or weakening<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                  Motivation<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                  A cognitive bias may influence the very existence of motivation (trigger it or extinguish it), and may strengthen or weaken existing motivation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                  Perception of Feasibility<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                  A cognitive bias may influence the assessment of feasibility and make the sense of feasibility stronger or weaker (both by affecting the perception of one\u2019s own capabilities and the subjectively perceived difficulty of the task itself).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                  A distorted assessment caused by a cognitive bias may therefore result in:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                    \n
                  • evaluating a task as feasible when it is not feasible;<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                  • evaluating a task as unfeasible when it is feasible.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                    and consequently:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                      \n
                    • making a decision when the goal is \u201cdesirable\u201d but objectively unattainable (lack of feasibility);<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    • not making a decision when the goal is objectively attainable and desirable.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                      Trigger<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                      With respect to the trigger, a cognitive bias may strengthen or weaken its effect. This means that, at a sufficient intensity of cognitive distortion:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                        \n
                      • certain cognitive biases may interpret as a trigger a factor that, under other circumstances, would not be interpreted that way;<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                      • an objectively strong trigger may turn out to be too weak, even though it would be sufficient to make a decision if the bias of that type and intensity were not present;<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                      • an objectively weak trigger may turn out to be strong enough to make a decision, even though without the presence of a bias of that type and intensity, it would not be sufficient.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                        To illustrate this, I will use a table showing the possible influence of selected cognitive biases on a chosen element of the decision triad \u2014 feasibility<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                        Table 3: Influence of Selected Cognitive Biases on the Perception of Task Feasibility in the Fogg Model<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                        Cognitive Bias<\/strong><\/th>How It Distorts the Perception of Feasibility<\/strong><\/th>Consequences for Making a Decision About Change in the Fogg Model<\/strong><\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
                        Confirmation bias<\/strong><\/th>Reinforces the belief that previous actions were correct<\/td>May result in a decision to change \/ or no decision to change<\/td><\/tr>
                        Fundamental Attribution Error<\/strong><\/th>Explains the other party\u2019s stance by attributing it to presumed internal traits (e.g., character traits)<\/td>May result in a decision to change \/ or no decision to change<\/td><\/tr>
                        Feedback loop<\/strong><\/th>Strengthens initial assumptions, leading to radicalization<\/td>May result in a decision to change \/ or no decision to change<\/td><\/tr>
                        Coupled Confirmation Bias<\/strong><\/th>Leads to radicalization and escalation<\/td>Results in a decision to change<\/td><\/tr>
                        Status quo bias<\/strong><\/th>Leads to a desire to maintain the current state (status quo)<\/td>Results in no decision to change<\/td><\/tr>
                        Sunk cost fallacy<\/strong><\/th>Leads to a desire to maintain the current state (status quo) and deepen it<\/td>Results in no decision to change<\/td><\/tr>
                        Hyper\u2011usefulness bias (AI)<\/strong><\/th>Strengthens initial assumptions, which may lead to radicalization<\/td>May result in a decision to change \/ or no decision to change<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

                        <\/p>\n\n\n\n

                        The Influence of Cognitive Biases on Decision Parameters<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                        A cognitive bias may \u2014 independently of its earlier influence on the very act of making a decision according to the Fogg model \u2014 appear and exert its effect at the next stage, i.e., when setting the parameters for executing the decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                        Thus, it may influence the vector<\/strong> of the decision and result in our reacting to a given stimulus by making an incorrect decision about maintaining or changing the current state. Example: the radio is playing too loudly. I decide to remove the inconsistency between the volume of the music and my well\u2011being. A cognitive bias may cause me, instead of adjusting the radio to myself \u2014 lowering the volume or turning it off (vector 1, dynamics +, determination L) \u2014 to try to \u201cget used to it\u201d (vector 1, dynamics \u2013, determination L).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                        A cognitive bias may influence the dynamics<\/strong> of the decision and result in my choosing action instead of non\u2011action incorrectly, after having already set the vector (my stance toward the current state). Example: during a trek, my leg hurts. I want to eliminate the pain (vector 1 \u2014 change of the current state). But under the influence of a cognitive bias, I incorrectly choose the dynamics and opt for activity (walking off the pain) instead of passivity (stopping and resting).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                        Cognitive biases may likewise influence determination<\/strong>, increasing or weakening it. This results in greater engagement and greater willingness to take risks than would follow from a rational assessment. Example: a poorly managed company is generating losses, and my business partner once again asks me to contribute a significant amount of money. A cognitive bias in the form of the sunk cost fallacy may increase my determination to invest more (vector 0 \u2014 decision to stay, dynamics + in the form of contributing more funds), causing me to invest more than I would if I were not under the influence of this bias.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                        As we can see, cognitive biases may independently affect each element of the decision triad and each of the decision parameters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                        The Operation of a Cognitive Bias and Its Possible Consequences<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                        I understand the decision\u2011making process as follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                          \n
                        1. first, there is a stimulus<\/strong>;<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                        2. then, the decision triad<\/strong> results in making a decision or not making a decision;<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                        3. next, the decision parameters<\/strong> are selected, which serve the function of executing the decision.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

                          I emphasize that the choice of decision parameters may be correct or incorrect (like running up a tree to escape a bear). They are merely tools \u2014 ways of executing a decision whose source lies in motivation. Whether we correctly perform the fundamental reasoning \u2014 choosing the method of achieving the goal \u2014 depends on us or on external factors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                          In legal practice, I often see how frequently people make serious errors here: they want to achieve something, but they use tools that cannot bring them closer to the goal. Or they use the right tools incorrectly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                          The errors we may commit when setting decision parameters can be divided into:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                            \n
                          • choosing a tool that under no circumstances serves the achievement of the given goal;<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                          • choosing a tool that, under these circumstances, is not suitable for achieving the intended goal;<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                          • incorrect use of a correctly chosen tool:\n
                              \n
                            • regarding the method<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                            • regarding the direction<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                              Let us note that cognitive biases may influence the final shape of our decision at every stage of its formation:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                \n
                              • the emergence of motivation;<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                              • the assessment of feasibility;<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                              • susceptibility to a trigger;<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                              • the setting of the parameters for executing the decision.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                                How Can a Specific Cognitive Bias Distort Decisions?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                                Let us now examine how certain cognitive biases may influence:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                  \n
                                1. the act of making a decision (Fogg\u2019s decision triad), and<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                2. the parameters of that decision: vector, dynamics, and determination.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

                                  I do not have space here to show all possible variants: the influence of every identified bias on each element of the decision triad and each element of the decision parameters. Nor do I have space to show the influence of \u201cclusters of cognitive biases\u201d operating simultaneously or sequentially.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                  What I can<\/em> do within this article is show how one<\/strong> bias affects the decision\u2011making process. I will therefore use confirmation bias<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                  As a starting point, we must of course assume the most probable decision that would be made if the bias were not present<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                  The Influence of Confirmation Bias on Individual Elements of the Decision Process<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                                  Let us use the example described earlier \u2014 encountering a bear in the mountains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                  My biological sensors detect danger \u2192 motivation to preserve life arises \u2192 I assess the task as feasible \u2192 the trigger is the assessment that a short time window appears in which I have a chance, but I must act now \u2192 I make the decision that I want to stay alive (vector 0) \u2192 as the tool (in this case) I choose playing dead (passivity, dynamics \u2013) \u2192 my determination is very high (H).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                  This determination is very interesting in this example. It manifests in my tolerance for costs \u2014 the bear may scratch me, test me, even step on me, but I decide to remain in an uncomfortable situation (one I am not accustomed to), in which I suffer successive losses and injuries, for as long as necessary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                  How can confirmation bias operate in such a situation? Recall that it consists in seeking confirmation of the correctness of a previously made decision and attributing confirmatory value to factors that do not logically carry it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                  The influence of this bias may be presented in the following table.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                  Table 4: The Influence of Confirmation Bias on the Decision\u2011Making Process<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                                  Stage of the Decision Process<\/strong><\/th>Element<\/strong><\/th>Influence of Confirmation Bias: Reinforcement or Weakening<\/strong><\/th>Effect<\/strong><\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
                                  Fogg Triad<\/strong><\/th>Motivation<\/strong><\/td>\u2191 or \u2193<\/td>We become inclined to maintain the previously chosen course<\/td><\/tr>
                                  <\/th>Feasibility<\/strong><\/td>\u2191 or \u2193<\/td>The perception of feasibility becomes distorted. The direction depends on whether the analyzed action aligns with the previously chosen course<\/td><\/tr>
                                  <\/th>Trigger<\/strong><\/td>\u2191 or \u2193<\/td>We may become over\u2011reactive or, conversely, fail to react to triggers that we would<\/em> respond to if the bias were absent<\/td><\/tr>
                                  Decision Parameters<\/strong><\/th>Vector (0\/1)<\/strong><\/td>\u2014<\/td>The vector becomes confirmed<\/td><\/tr>
                                  <\/th>Dynamics (+\/\u2013)<\/strong><\/td>\u2014<\/td>The chosen dynamics becomes reinforced<\/td><\/tr>
                                  <\/th>Determination (L\/H)<\/strong><\/td>\u2014<\/td>Determination increases to an irrational level<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

                                  The Influence of Various Cognitive Biases on a Selected Element of the Decision Process<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                                  As mentioned above, each cognitive bias may act on each element of the decision process (individually or in selected combinations). Above, I showed how a single cognitive bias \u2014 confirmation bias \u2014 affects the entire decision\u2011making process. Now I will show how each cognitive bias may act on a selected<\/strong> element of the decision process. Let that element be the vector<\/strong> of the decision. For simplicity, I will remain with the familiar example of the bear encounter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                  Table\u00a05:\u00a0Influence\u00a0of\u00a0Selected\u00a0Cognitive\u00a0Biases\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0Decision\u00a0Vector\u00a0(Using\u00a0the\u00a0Bear\u00a0Encounter\u00a0Example)<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                                  Cognitive Bias<\/strong><\/th>How It Distorts the Assessment of the Situation<\/strong><\/th>Influence on the Decision Vector (0 = status quo \/ 1 = change)<\/strong><\/th>Bear Example<\/strong><\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
                                  Confirmation bias<\/strong><\/th>Strengthens earlier assumptions and interpretations<\/td>May reinforce vector 0 or 1 depending on the prior narrative<\/td>Wanting to survive, I may engage in wishful thinking and see opportunities where none exist, just to maintain hope<\/td><\/tr>
                                  Fundamental Attribution Error<\/strong><\/th>Attributes the bear\u2019s behavior to its \u201cbad intentions\u201d rather than the situation<\/td>May reinforce vector 0 or 1 depending on the prior narrative<\/td>I assume the bear \u201cwill definitely attack me,\u201d even though it is only observing me \u2192 I start running, which provokes it to chase me<\/td><\/tr>
                                  Status quo bias<\/strong><\/th>Overestimates the safety of the current state<\/td>Pushes toward vector 0<\/td>I remain motionless even though the bear has noticed me and the situation requires change<\/td><\/tr>
                                  Sunk cost fallacy<\/strong><\/th>Strengthens attachment to the previous strategy<\/td>Reinforces vector 0 or 1 depending on the situation<\/td>\u201cSince I\u2019ve already endured so long pretending to be dead, I must endure longer\u201d \u2014 even though the situation is worsening because the bear is sitting on me and I may suffocate<\/td><\/tr>
                                  Coupled Confirmation Bias<\/strong><\/th>Does not occur because the bear does not use AI (for now)<\/td>Does not apply<\/td>Does not apply<\/td><\/tr>
                                  Tunnel vision<\/strong><\/th>Narrows perception to one aspect of the situation<\/td>Strengthens the chosen vector<\/td>I climbed a tree and feel relieved that I saved my life. I suppress the fact that bears climb trees very well and will be up here shortly<\/td><\/tr>
                                  Feedback loop<\/strong><\/th>Strengthens the initial interpretation through successive stimuli<\/td>Reinforces vector 1 or 0, usually toward escalation<\/td>I sit in the tree and call a friend who tells me it was a great idea. My conviction is reinforced \u2014 at least until the bear gets hungry enough to come after me<\/td><\/tr>
                                  Hyper\u2011usefulness bias<\/strong><\/th>Overestimates the accuracy of earlier \u201csuggestions\u201d or heuristics<\/td>Vector is set according to the earlier \u201csuggestion,\u201d not the real situation<\/td>If, sitting in the tree, I ask AI whether I made the right choice, and my digital assistant replies: \u201cAndrzej, that was an excellent decision\u2026\u201d I may become so confident that I start provoking the bear<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

                                  The Influence of Cognitive Biases on Decision\u2011Making and Decision Parameters. Summary<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                                  An attempt to analyze the operation of individual cognitive biases allows us to cautiously draw the conclusion that some of them tend to influence specific decision parameters in characteristic ways. As an example, I will use a two\u2011dimensional chart that includes only vector<\/strong> and dynamics<\/strong>, but does not include determination<\/strong> (this would require a three\u2011dimensional chart). We can see that some biases are more likely to \u201cpull\u201d a given parameter in a particular direction, while others may have no influence on, for example, dynamics, but will influence the vector. This can be cautiously presented in the following way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                  \"Infographic<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

                                  Let us remember one thing from this. To err is human. We all make mistakes, constantly. Some of the causes of our errors are within our control; others are not. Cognitive biases have the particular feature of operating covertly, exerting a very strong influence on how we perceive reality. They pull us in like quicksand and can cause us to lose contact with reality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                  The easiest way to protect ourselves from them is by learning about them<\/strong>, studying them<\/strong>, and checking the logic of our thinking<\/strong>. If we know them, we will learn to detect them \u2014 and that will protect us from many extremely costly mistakes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                  In several previous texts, I presented some cognitive biases (thinking traps), including the fundamental attribution error, tunnel vision, and my original concept of the Coupled Confirmation Bias. I wrote about them mainly in the context of their impact on the dynamics of conflict, which I observe in my daily work. Now I want to take […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":4725,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[347,349,377,348],"tags":[407,330,538,518,449,523,516,519,379,509,531,393,515,360,517],"class_list":["post-5345","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ai-in-my-work","category-cognitive-bias","category-commercial-law","category-family-cases","tag-attorney-in-poland","tag-coupled-confirmation-bias","tag-decisions-3-parameters","tag-divorce-strategy","tag-foggs-decisions-making-model","tag-fundamental-attribution-error","tag-highly-recommended-lawyer-in-poland","tag-law-firm-international-divorce-poland","tag-legal-support-for-foreign-smes-operating-in-poland","tag-litigation-lawyer-poland","tag-strategic-advising-in-divorce","tag-trusted-law-firm-in-poland","tag-trusted-lawyer-in-poland","tag-tunnel-vision","tag-vip-divorce-poland"],"yoast_head":"\nHow Cognitive Biases Distort Decisions: The Jakubiec Framework<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Decision's Parameters. Explore how cognitive biases distort decision\u2011making and read about the Vector\u2013Dynamics-Determination Matrix\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"How Cognitive Biases Distort Decisions: The Jakubiec Framework\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Decision's Parameters. Explore how cognitive biases distort decision\u2011making and read about the Vector\u2013Dynamics-Determination Matrix\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Jakubiec i Wsp\u00f3lnicy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jakubieciwspolnicy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-06T11:37:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-06T11:37:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/Business-lawyer-in-Poland.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1010\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"673\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"dr Andrzej Jakubiec - adwokat, mediator\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"dr Andrzej Jakubiec - adwokat, mediator\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"28 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/en\\\/decisions-parameters-jakubiec-matrix\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"dr Andrzej Jakubiec - adwokat, mediator\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c710ea4163b7bf9ac32b1fcd1ec193ce\"},\"headline\":\"Cognitive Traps and Their Impact on Decision\u2011Making in the Fogg Model\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-06T11:37:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-06T11:37:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/en\\\/decisions-parameters-jakubiec-matrix\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":4711,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/05\\\/Business-lawyer-in-Poland.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"attorney in Poland\",\"Coupled Confirmation Bias\",\"Decision's 3 Parameters\",\"Divorce Strategy\",\"Fogg's Decisions Making Model\",\"Fundamental Attribution Error\",\"highly recommended lawyer in Poland\",\"Law Firm International Divorce Poland\",\"LEGAL SUPPORT FOR FOREIGN SMES OPERATING IN POLAND\",\"litigation lawyer Poland\",\"strategic advising in divorce\",\"Trusted law firm in Poland\",\"trusted lawyer in Poland\",\"Tunnel Vision\",\"VIP Divorce Poland\"],\"articleSection\":[\"AI in my work\",\"cognitive bias\",\"commercial law\",\"family cases\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/en\\\/decisions-parameters-jakubiec-matrix\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\\\/\",\"name\":\"How Cognitive Biases Distort Decisions: The Jakubiec Framework\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/05\\\/Business-lawyer-in-Poland.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-06T11:37:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-06T11:37:42+00:00\",\"description\":\"Decision's Parameters. Explore how cognitive biases distort decision\u2011making and read about the Vector\u2013Dynamics-Determination Matrix\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/05\\\/Business-lawyer-in-Poland.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/05\\\/Business-lawyer-in-Poland.jpg\",\"width\":1010,\"height\":673,\"caption\":\"Holidays with a child living in Poland\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Strona g\u0142\u00f3wna\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vector\u2013Dynamics-Determination Matrix\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/\",\"name\":\"Jakubiec i Wsp\u00f3lnicy\",\"description\":\"Pracujemy g\u0142\u00f3wnie dla biznesu i jeste\u015bmy bardzo dobrzy w tym co robimy.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Jakubiec i Wsp\u00f3lnicy\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Kancelaria-Jakubieci-Wspolnicy-scaled.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Kancelaria-Jakubieci-Wspolnicy-scaled.jpeg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1750,\"caption\":\"Jakubiec i Wsp\u00f3lnicy\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c710ea4163b7bf9ac32b1fcd1ec193ce\",\"name\":\"dr Andrzej Jakubiec - adwokat, mediator\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/3f5a36383919c02c0aff922eaf2979cc12c7d595d746aaa6060376faa51e5c2b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/3f5a36383919c02c0aff922eaf2979cc12c7d595d746aaa6060376faa51e5c2b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/3f5a36383919c02c0aff922eaf2979cc12c7d595d746aaa6060376faa51e5c2b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"dr Andrzej Jakubiec - adwokat, mediator\"},\"description\":\"\u00a0\u00a0jakubiec@jakubieciwspolnicy.pl \u00a0\u00a0+48 536 270 935\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\\\/en\\\/author\\\/andrzej-jakubiec\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"How Cognitive Biases Distort Decisions: The Jakubiec Framework","description":"Decision's Parameters. Explore how cognitive biases distort decision\u2011making and read about the Vector\u2013Dynamics-Determination Matrix","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"How Cognitive Biases Distort Decisions: The Jakubiec Framework","og_description":"Decision's Parameters. Explore how cognitive biases distort decision\u2011making and read about the Vector\u2013Dynamics-Determination Matrix","og_url":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\/","og_site_name":"Jakubiec i Wsp\u00f3lnicy","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jakubieciwspolnicy","article_published_time":"2026-06-06T11:37:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-06T11:37:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1010,"height":673,"url":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/Business-lawyer-in-Poland.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"dr Andrzej Jakubiec - adwokat, mediator","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"dr Andrzej Jakubiec - adwokat, mediator","Est. reading time":"28 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/en\/decisions-parameters-jakubiec-matrix\/"},"author":{"name":"dr Andrzej Jakubiec - adwokat, mediator","@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/#\/schema\/person\/c710ea4163b7bf9ac32b1fcd1ec193ce"},"headline":"Cognitive Traps and Their Impact on Decision\u2011Making in the Fogg Model","datePublished":"2026-06-06T11:37:37+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-06T11:37:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/en\/decisions-parameters-jakubiec-matrix\/"},"wordCount":4711,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/Business-lawyer-in-Poland.jpg","keywords":["attorney in Poland","Coupled Confirmation Bias","Decision's 3 Parameters","Divorce Strategy","Fogg's Decisions Making Model","Fundamental Attribution Error","highly recommended lawyer in Poland","Law Firm International Divorce Poland","LEGAL SUPPORT FOR FOREIGN SMES OPERATING IN POLAND","litigation lawyer Poland","strategic advising in divorce","Trusted law firm in Poland","trusted lawyer in Poland","Tunnel Vision","VIP Divorce Poland"],"articleSection":["AI in my work","cognitive bias","commercial law","family cases"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/en\/decisions-parameters-jakubiec-matrix\/","url":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\/","name":"How Cognitive Biases Distort Decisions: The Jakubiec Framework","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/Business-lawyer-in-Poland.jpg","datePublished":"2026-06-06T11:37:37+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-06T11:37:42+00:00","description":"Decision's Parameters. Explore how cognitive biases distort decision\u2011making and read about the Vector\u2013Dynamics-Determination Matrix","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/Business-lawyer-in-Poland.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/Business-lawyer-in-Poland.jpg","width":1010,"height":673,"caption":"Holidays with a child living in Poland"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/vector-dynamics-determination-cognitive-bias-matrix\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Strona g\u0142\u00f3wna","item":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vector\u2013Dynamics-Determination Matrix"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/#website","url":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/","name":"Jakubiec i Wsp\u00f3lnicy","description":"Pracujemy g\u0142\u00f3wnie dla biznesu i jeste\u015bmy bardzo dobrzy w tym co robimy.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/#organization","name":"Jakubiec i Wsp\u00f3lnicy","url":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Kancelaria-Jakubieci-Wspolnicy-scaled.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Kancelaria-Jakubieci-Wspolnicy-scaled.jpeg","width":2560,"height":1750,"caption":"Jakubiec i Wsp\u00f3lnicy"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/jakubieciwspolnicy"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/#\/schema\/person\/c710ea4163b7bf9ac32b1fcd1ec193ce","name":"dr Andrzej Jakubiec - adwokat, mediator","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3f5a36383919c02c0aff922eaf2979cc12c7d595d746aaa6060376faa51e5c2b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3f5a36383919c02c0aff922eaf2979cc12c7d595d746aaa6060376faa51e5c2b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3f5a36383919c02c0aff922eaf2979cc12c7d595d746aaa6060376faa51e5c2b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"dr Andrzej Jakubiec - adwokat, mediator"},"description":"\u00a0\u00a0jakubiec@jakubieciwspolnicy.pl \u00a0\u00a0+48 536 270 935","url":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/en\/author\/andrzej-jakubiec\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5345","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5345"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5345\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5385,"href":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5345\/revisions\/5385"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4725"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5345"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5345"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jakubieciwspolnicy.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}